tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6196201224507060771.post4133637203783177165..comments2023-12-18T05:12:50.293-05:00Comments on LAW PROF on the LOOSE: "Federalism Amendment"Jon Siegelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05903271363747693689noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6196201224507060771.post-28903668308986989572012-06-07T14:43:22.401-04:002012-06-07T14:43:22.401-04:00But my friend, this is exactly what the 16th Amend...But my friend, this is exactly what the 16th Amendment says. The wording of the 16th Amendment is very clear. The 16th Amendment is a direct prohibition of a direct income tax upon private enterprise. Read it again. <br /><br />The income tax has been applied to private labor by political means only, not legal. Never in the history of the USA has the USSC applied the income tax to private enterprise through an analysis of the 16th Amendment. Read Brushaber again. <br /><br />The US Circuits have used quotes from Bowers; statements that only applied to excise / corporate tax concerning Brushaber and have applied them consistently to a direct tax jurisdiction. This has been political judicial corruption of process and due to pure power politics. The US Circuits misquote Brushaber constantly. Read it your self – what the US Circuits say about Brushaber as applied to private enterprise is all a lie. They quote Bowers and cite Brushaber and transform an excise corporate income tax into a direct tax upon private enterprise, a legal lie. Judicial magical thinking. Power politics.<br /><br />The 16th Amendment is actually proper and very clear.<br /><br />A direct tax upon income is prohibited from being placed in a direct tax jurisdiction prospectively and retrospectively.<br />Or<br />All direct taxes upon incomes shall be an excise.<br />Or<br />The direct classification jurisdiction of taxes shall not contain an income tax.<br /><br />An income source is not a tax target over which Congress establishes jurisdiction, and, under the 16th Amendment, the source of income is irrelevant within an excise jurisdiction. <br /><br />Look at the IRS regulation concerning the income tax application and enforcement. The tax target is the individual, and the jurisdiction arises from geographic uniformity only, an excise tax. <br /><br />Under the 16th Amendment and the Code and the IRS regulations for compliance – all income of invested wealth (dividends – from within an excise jurisdiction) – is subject to the tax. <br /><br />Personality and the income thereof (See the second hearing of Pollock) are direct and therefore explicitly excluded from this income tax, it is prohibited.<br /><br />The problem with the 16th Amendment is in how it is enforced. Its enforcement is unconstitutional and it related to US Circuit Court legal process corruption by political power and corporate wealth. We now live in a police state, not a constitutional democracy.<br /><br />Dr. Paul Mobley<br />A legal and political analystAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com